Screener
ESPO vs BBH
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
- BBH costs 0.20% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BBH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $365M |
| Since | 2018 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 18.82% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and BBH
Explore further