Screener
ESPO vs PPH
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
Key differences
- PPH costs 0.19% less per year.
- PPH is significantly larger than ESPO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | PPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $966M |
| Since | 2018 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +12.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 17.11% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -29.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and PPH
Explore further