Screener
ESPO vs GPZ
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.15% less per year.
- ESPO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $245M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | — |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and GPZ
Explore further