Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EWA vs EEM

iShares MSCI Australia ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

EWA

iShares MSCI Australia ETF

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$1.5B

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$30.3B

Key differences

Both EWA and EEM are equity ETFs. EWA charges 0.50% a year and EEM 0.72%. The main difference: EWA covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEM covers emerging markets.

  • EWA covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEM covers emerging markets.
  • EWA costs 0.22% less per year.
  • EEM is much larger than EWA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EWA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EWAEEM
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.72%
Fund size (AUM)$1.5B$30.3B
Since19962003
Dividend yield2.87%1.77%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+10.1%+42.2%
CAGR 3Y+12.6%+22.1%
CAGR 5Y+5.2%+5.8%
Sharpe 3Y0.530.98
Volatility 1Y17.19%21.09%
Max drawdown-45.54%-39.82%

Similar to EWA and EEM