Screener
EWA vs EMXC
iShares MSCI Australia ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
Both EWA and EMXC are equity ETFs. EWA charges 0.50% a year and EMXC 0.25%. The main difference: EWA covers the Asia-Pacific region; EMXC covers emerging markets.
- EWA covers the Asia-Pacific region; EMXC covers emerging markets.
- EMXC costs 0.25% less per year.
- EMXC is much larger than EWA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWA | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $24.6B |
| Since | 1996 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 2.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.1% | +60.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +11.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.19% | 23.12% |
| Max drawdown | -45.54% | -42.81% |
Similar to EWA and EMXC
Explore further