Screener
EWA vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Australia ETF vs Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both EWA and FLAX are equity ETFs. EWA charges 0.50% a year and FLAX 0.19%. The main difference: FLAX costs 0.31% less per year.
- FLAX costs 0.31% less per year.
- EWA is much larger than FLAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWA | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $52M |
| Since | 1996 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.1% | +44.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.19% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -45.54% | -42.51% |
Similar to EWA and FLAX
Explore further