Screener
EWJ vs IPAC
iShares MSCI Japan ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.40% less per year.
- EWJ is significantly larger than IPAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWJ | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21.0B | $2.5B |
| Since | 1996 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.08% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.5% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.0% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.77% | 16.58% |
| Max drawdown | -33.14% | -31.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EWJ and IPAC
Explore further