Screener
IPAC vs SCJ
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.41% less per year.
- IPAC is significantly larger than SCJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $235M |
| Since | 2014 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.58% | 16.10% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -37.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAC and SCJ
Explore further