Screener
EWM vs IPAC
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both EWM and IPAC are equity ETFs. EWM charges 0.50% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: EWM covers emerging markets; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWM covers emerging markets; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- IPAC costs 0.41% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than EWM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IPAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWM | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $366M | $2.6B |
| Since | 1996 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.25% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.04% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -43.81% | -31.00% |
Similar to EWM and IPAC
Explore further