Screener
EWM vs ASEA
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
Key differences
Both EWM and ASEA are equity ETFs. EWM charges 0.50% a year and ASEA 0.65%. The main difference: EWM covers emerging markets; ASEA covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWM covers emerging markets; ASEA covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWM costs 0.15% less per year.
- EWM is much larger than ASEA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWM | ASEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $366M | $97M |
| Since | 1996 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.25% | 3.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.04% | 14.17% |
| Max drawdown | -43.81% | -44.16% |
Similar to EWM and ASEA
Explore further