Screener
ISMF vs FAAR
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.18% less per year.
- ISMF covers global markets; FAAR covers north america.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; FAAR uses long short.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $57M | $168M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.50% | 9.07% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +41.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.87% | 13.44% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -18.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISMF and FAAR
Explore further