Screener
FDAT vs BDGS
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Key differences
- FDAT costs 0.09% less per year.
- FDAT is classified as alternative, while BDGS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; BDGS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BDGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | BDGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $42M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.68% | 0.53% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | 6.06% |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -9.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDAT and BDGS
Explore further