Screener
FDAT vs RHRX
Tactical Advantage ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
- FDAT costs 0.60% less per year.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $34M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.68% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +42.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | 13.30% |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -25.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDAT and RHRX
Explore further