Screener
FELC vs BIBL
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF vs Inspire 100 ETF
Key differences
- FELC costs 0.17% less per year.
- FELC is significantly larger than BIBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELC follows a active selection strategy; BIBL uses index tracking.
- FELC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FELC | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.0B | $436M |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.3% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.05% | 15.49% |
| Max drawdown | -18.59% | -36.12% |
Similar to FELC and BIBL
Explore further