Screener
FFLS vs XFLX
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
- XFLX costs 0.63% less per year.
- FFLS is classified as alternative, while XFLX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; XFLX uses active selection.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $49M |
| Since | 2023 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 9.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.7% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.87% | 3.52% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -6.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFLS and XFLX
Explore further