Screener
FFLS vs XCOR
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Fundx ETF
Key differences
- XCOR costs 0.45% less per year.
- XCOR is significantly larger than FFLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFLS is classified as alternative, while XCOR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; XCOR uses active selection.
- XCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | XCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 1.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $180M |
| Since | 2023 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.7% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.87% | 12.85% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -22.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFLS and XCOR
Explore further