Screener
FFLS vs XNAV
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 0.33% less per year.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $31M |
| Since | 2023 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.7% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.87% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFLS and XNAV
Explore further