Screener
FFND vs EWJ
One Global ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
Both FFND and EWJ are equity ETFs. FFND charges 1.00% a year and EWJ 0.49%. The main difference: FFND follows a active selection strategy; EWJ uses index tracking.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; EWJ uses index tracking.
- FFND covers global markets; EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWJ costs 0.51% less per year.
- EWJ is much larger than FFND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $103M | $21.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.16% | 19.84% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -33.14% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.