Screener
FFND vs SCJ
One Global ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both FFND and SCJ are equity ETFs. FFND charges 1.00% a year and SCJ 0.50%. The main difference: FFND follows a active selection strategy; SCJ uses index tracking.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; SCJ uses index tracking.
- FFND covers global markets; SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- SCJ costs 0.50% less per year.
- Over the last three years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $103M | $245M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 2.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.16% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -37.28% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.