Screener
FFND vs OAEM
One Global ETF vs OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- FFND costs 0.25% less per year.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; OAEM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | OAEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 1.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $100M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 22.18% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -17.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and OAEM
Explore further