Screener
FFND vs OALC
One Global ETF vs OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- OALC costs 0.51% less per year.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; OALC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | OALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $220M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +34.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 13.05% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -26.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and OALC
Explore further