Screener
FFND vs OAIM
One Global ETF vs OneAscent International Equity ETF
Key differences
- OAIM costs 0.05% less per year.
- OAIM is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; OAIM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | OAIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $344M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 15.74% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -14.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and OAIM
Explore further