Screener
FFND vs OASC
One Global ETF vs OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- OASC costs 0.31% less per year.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; OASC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $78M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +39.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -26.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and OASC
Explore further