Screener
FFOX vs FFLS
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
- FFOX costs 0.58% less per year.
- FFOX is significantly larger than FFLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFOX is classified as equity, while FFLS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FFOX follows a active selection strategy; FFLS uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFOX | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.02% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $217M | $42M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.13% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -0.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.87% |
| Max drawdown | -12.41% | -11.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFOX and FFLS
Explore further