Skip to content
Screener

FFOX vs MEMA

FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF

FFOX

FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF

Annual cost

1.02%

Fund size

$220M

MEMA

Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$13M

Key differences

FFOX is an equity ETF, while MEMA is an alternative ETF. FFOX charges 1.02% a year and MEMA 0.85%.

  • FFOX is an equity fund, while MEMA is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • FFOX follows a active selection strategy; MEMA uses long short.
  • FFOX covers North America; MEMA covers emerging markets.
  • MEMA costs 0.17% less per year.
  • FFOX is much larger than MEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

FFOXMEMA
Annual cost (TER)1.02%0.85%
Fund size (AUM)$220M$13M
Since20252025
Dividend yield
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionlong short
CAGR 1Y+17.3%N/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y17.59%
Max drawdown-12.41%-13.12%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to FFOX and MEMA