Screener
FFSM vs BIBL
Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF vs Inspire 100 ETF
Key differences
- FFSM follows a active selection strategy; BIBL uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFSM | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $436M |
| Since | — | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.2% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.06% | 15.49% |
| Max drawdown | -26.65% | -36.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFSM and BIBL
Explore further