Screener
FFTY vs GRPZ
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
Key differences
- GRPZ costs 0.45% less per year.
- FFTY is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $3M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.09% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -27.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and GRPZ
Explore further