Screener
FLAU vs AAXJ
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both FLAU and AAXJ are equity ETFs. FLAU charges 0.09% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: FLAU costs 0.63% less per year.
- FLAU costs 0.63% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than FLAU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAU | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $86M | $4.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.92% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.93% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -45.73% | -44.52% |
Similar to FLAU and AAXJ
Explore further