Screener
FLAU vs EWA
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF vs iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Key differences
Both FLAU and EWA are equity ETFs. FLAU charges 0.09% a year and EWA 0.50%. The main difference: FLAU costs 0.41% less per year.
- FLAU costs 0.41% less per year.
- EWA is much larger than FLAU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAU | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $86M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2017 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 2.92% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | +5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.93% | 17.19% |
| Max drawdown | -45.73% | -45.54% |
Similar to FLAU and EWA
Explore further