Screener
FLAX vs GMF
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both FLAX and GMF are equity ETFs. FLAX charges 0.19% a year and GMF 0.49%. The main difference: FLAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; GMF covers emerging markets.
- FLAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; GMF covers emerging markets.
- FLAX costs 0.30% less per year.
- GMF is much larger than FLAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAX | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $406M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.8% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.4% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 17.01% |
| Max drawdown | -42.51% | -40.18% |
Similar to FLAX and GMF
Explore further