Screener
GMF vs FLJP
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
Key differences
Both GMF and FLJP are equity ETFs. GMF charges 0.49% a year and FLJP 0.09%. The main difference: GMF covers emerging markets; FLJP covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- GMF covers emerging markets; FLJP covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- FLJP costs 0.40% less per year.
- FLJP is much larger than GMF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMF | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $406M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 4.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.01% | 19.17% |
| Max drawdown | -40.18% | -32.49% |
Similar to GMF and FLJP
Explore further