Screener
FLAX vs EEMA
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both FLAX and EEMA are equity ETFs. FLAX charges 0.19% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: FLAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- FLAX covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- FLAX costs 0.30% less per year.
- EEMA is much larger than FLAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAX | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.8% | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.4% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -42.51% | -44.18% |
Similar to FLAX and EEMA
Explore further