Screener
FMET vs RGLO
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- FMET costs 0.10% less per year.
- RGLO is significantly larger than FMET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMET | RGLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $309M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.55% | — |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMET and RGLO
Explore further