Screener
FTSL vs KMAR
First Trust Senior Loan Fund vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- FTSL costs 0.09% less per year.
- FTSL is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTSL is classified as fixed income, while KMAR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FTSL follows a index tracking strategy; KMAR uses structured outcome.
- FTSL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTSL | KMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $35M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.50% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.9% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.53 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.12% | 9.38% |
| Max drawdown | -22.67% | -10.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTSL and KMAR
Explore further