Screener
KMAR vs SRLN
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March vs State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
- SRLN costs 0.09% less per year.
- SRLN is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KMAR is classified as alternative, while SRLN is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KMAR follows a structured outcome strategy; SRLN uses index tracking.
- SRLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KMAR | SRLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $5.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 7.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.38% | 2.88% |
| Max drawdown | -10.06% | -22.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KMAR and SRLN
Explore further