Screener
FYT vs ACSV
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund vs American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSV costs 0.21% less per year.
- FYT is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FYT follows a index tracking strategy; ACSV uses active selection.
- FYT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FYT | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $183M | $12M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.16% | — |
| Max drawdown | -50.48% | -7.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FYT and ACSV
Explore further