Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GLTR vs BTGD

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF vs STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF

GLTR

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$2.9B

BTGD

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF

Annual cost

1.05%

Fund size

$55M

Key differences

GLTR is a commodity ETF, while BTGD is an alternative ETF. GLTR charges 0.60% a year and BTGD 1.05%.

  • GLTR is a commodity fund, while BTGD is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • GLTR costs 0.45% less per year.
  • GLTR is much larger than BTGD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GLTR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GLTRBTGD
Annual cost (TER)0.60%1.05%
Fund size (AUM)$2.9B$55M
Since20102024
Dividend yield0.00%4.08%
Asset classcommodityalternative
Region
Strategymulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+45.5%-37.2%
CAGR 3Y+30.4%N/A
CAGR 5Y+14.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.01N/A
Volatility 1Y37.97%55.77%
Max drawdown-30.10%-53.31%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GLTR and BTGD