Screener
GMF vs FLJH
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
Key differences
Both GMF and FLJH are equity ETFs. GMF charges 0.49% a year and FLJH 0.09%. The main difference: GMF covers emerging markets; FLJH covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- GMF covers emerging markets; FLJH covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- FLJH costs 0.40% less per year.
- Over the last three years, FLJH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMF | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $406M | $166M |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 4.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +43.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | +19.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.01% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -40.18% | -31.55% |
Similar to GMF and FLJH
Explore further