Screener
GMF vs FLAU
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
Key differences
Both GMF and FLAU are equity ETFs. GMF charges 0.49% a year and FLAU 0.09%. The main difference: GMF covers emerging markets; FLAU covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- GMF covers emerging markets; FLAU covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- FLAU costs 0.40% less per year.
- GMF is much larger than FLAU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GMF | FLAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $406M | $86M |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 2.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | +5.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.01% | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -40.18% | -45.73% |
Similar to GMF and FLAU
Explore further