Screener
GTOC vs RWL
Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
GTOC is a fixed income ETF, while RWL is an equity ETF. GTOC charges 0.26% a year and RWL 0.39%.
- GTOC is a fixed income fund, while RWL is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GTOC follows a active selection strategy; RWL uses index tracking.
- GTOC costs 0.13% less per year.
- RWL is much larger than GTOC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOC | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $183M | $9.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.11% |
| Max drawdown | -2.70% | -36.04% |
Similar to GTOC and RWL
Explore further