Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GTOC vs RWL

Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

GTOC

Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF

Annual cost

0.26%

Fund size

$183M

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$9.1B

Key differences

GTOC is a fixed income ETF, while RWL is an equity ETF. GTOC charges 0.26% a year and RWL 0.39%.

  • GTOC is a fixed income fund, while RWL is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • GTOC follows a active selection strategy; RWL uses index tracking.
  • GTOC costs 0.13% less per year.
  • RWL is much larger than GTOC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GTOCRWL
Annual cost (TER)0.26%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$183M$9.1B
Since20252008
Dividend yield1.24%
Asset classfixed incomeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+27.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+21.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+13.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.33
Volatility 1Y10.11%
Max drawdown-2.70%-36.04%

Similar to GTOC and RWL