Screener
RWL vs PFIG
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.17% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL is classified as equity, while PFIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWL | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.8B | $113M |
| Since | 2008 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -36.04% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWL and PFIG
Explore further