Screener
HAP vs GNR
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- GNR is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $4.9B |
| Since | 2008 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -48.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and GNR
Explore further