Screener
HAP vs TURF
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP follows a index tracking strategy; TURF uses active selection.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | TURF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $117M |
| Since | 2008 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | — |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -6.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and TURF
Explore further