Screener
HAP vs NRES
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP is significantly larger than NRES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP is classified as equity, while NRES is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HAP follows a index tracking strategy; NRES uses multi strategy.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | NRES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $38M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 2.23% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +38.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 16.72% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -22.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and NRES
Explore further