Screener
HAP vs NANR
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.06% less per year.
- HAP is classified as equity, while NANR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HAP covers global markets; NANR covers north america.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $795M |
| Since | 2008 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +53.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -49.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and NANR
Explore further