Screener
HAP vs PBW
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.23% less per year.
- HAP covers global markets; PBW covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $447M |
| Since | 2008 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +159.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | -8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 40.43% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and PBW
Explore further