Screener
TURF vs NANR
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.09% less per year.
- NANR is significantly larger than TURF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TURF is classified as equity, while NANR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TURF follows a active selection strategy; NANR uses index tracking.
- NANR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TURF | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $795M |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +53.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -6.84% | -49.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TURF and NANR
Explore further