Screener
HARD vs LALT
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
Key differences
- HARD costs 0.40% less per year.
- HARD is classified as commodity, while LALT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, HARD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | LALT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 1.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $61M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 3.67% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.20% | 6.79% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -6.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HARD and LALT
Explore further