Screener
HARD vs FAAR
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
Key differences
- HARD costs 0.20% less per year.
- HARD is classified as commodity, while FAAR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, HARD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $168M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 9.07% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | — | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +41.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.20% | 13.44% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -18.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HARD and FAAR
Explore further