Screener
HARD vs FMF
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Key differences
- HARD costs 0.20% less per year.
- HARD is classified as commodity, while FMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, HARD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | FMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $266M |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 5.00% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.20% | 9.65% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -16.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HARD and FMF
Explore further